Quote:
Originally posted by Daryl H. Long
Chuck,
I just want to make sure we are on the same wavelenght of which scenario we are discussing. Maybe then we can come to some sort of agreement.
Scenario 1.
A1 starts try.
B1 fouls A1.
Try successful
Whistle.
A1 is injured.
A6 replaces A1 and shoots free throw.
Misses and bounces off rim.
While ball in air and before ball is touched B2 fouls A2.
Whistle.
A1 reports to scorer's table as a sub.
In this case the clock did not start because the foul preceded touching of the ball. Timer acted properly and did not start the clock. As the official I would tell A1 he would have to wait until next opportunity to sub after clock has started properly.
Do you agree?
|
More freaking bafflegab. This post has got absolutely
nothing to do with the argument we've been having. We are arguing about
your previous proclamations, as follows:
"If the foul by B was AFTER the ball was touched then the clock should have been properly started and Sub A1 may enter legally.
Just because the timer FAILED to start the clock properly does not take away conditions for A1 to legally re-enter the game".
Stick to this one. You admit in your own words that the clock never started. That doesn't matter though. You still want to negate a very plainly written rule in R3-3-4. Unfortunately, you have absolutely no rules justification to do so.Bafflegab doesn't make it right.