Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by rwest
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by TimTaylor
Really like to stir the poop, eh Juulie?
|
Yea, but it's not working!!
|
Let me see if I can stir the pot a bit!
If B1 is facing the basket with his back to A1 and A1 runs into the back of B1 with the ball, is it a PC? B1 did not have LGP on A1? Does that matter for a PC?
I'd call a PC foul, myself.
|
You would be correct to call a player control foul on A1, because even though B1 did not have a legal guarding postion against A1, but he had set a legal legal screen against A1.
MTD, Sr.
|
When did it become absolutely illegal by definition if there's contact between the screener and the screenee?
|
You correct that the contact between the screener and screenee (I hoped we spelled that word correctly) is only a foul if two things occur: 1) The screener is displaced. AND 2) The screenee goes through the screen. Having said that, I cannot remember the last time that a screenee who was moving at top speed was able to stop isntantly upon contact with the screener.
MTD, Sr.
|
OK, but I'm not sure if I agree that a dribbler coming down the lane is always moving at top speed. Could be, but not always.
In any event, why is this screening action? Isn't the dribbler responsible for *not* charging into opponents, outside of any screening principles? He does under ncaa.