View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2005, 08:39pm
scottk_61 scottk_61 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 573
I am going to say ......."Train wreck"
The play action caused the cather to lose the ball if I understand the scenario correctly.
To call obstruction in this case would be totally unfair to the defence and would not be in the spirit of the rules or of the rule change. IMO.
As for interference or not, there is not enough information in the sitch to decide.

I say train wreck, play on and then an out do to the tag in the end.

It seems to me that if we were to require the defense to never "lose" the ball, we are requiring the impossible
__________________
ISF
ASA/USA Elite
NIF
Reply With Quote