Sat Jan 29, 2005, 09:30pm
|
 |
Get away from me, Steve.
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by Rachel
The NCAA is the coaches game. The coaches write the rules.
|
That was my point. I have no problem with coaches being involved in the rules process. However, as we have all seen, sometimes is can get to the point of absurdity. I'm not particularly fond of the arrogance, or is it disdain, some coaches show towards officials.
Quote:
|
The main points of emphasis in this year's clinic were "Obstruction, batter interference and hit by pitch". These were the things that the coaches and the umpire evaluators felt that were not consistantly called. It is also where the wiley players were working on their acting skills in an attempt to help their team.
|
I guess this is part of my problem with the coaches' input. They recognize that they have coaches who are intentionally coaching in a manner which places a player in jeopardy. However, instead of a little in-house administrative action, they dictate the rule interps and place the onus on the umpires to cover their collective tails.
Quote:
|
I'm not ripping on the ASA. I knew umpires that were calling about to receive if the ball was in the infield.
|
And that is a baseball influence that somewhere along the way must be exercised to insure softball games are called by softball rules.
Quote:
I've known coaches that said they were going to teach their kids to obstruct because they wanted to take the chance to get the out. The punishment was only that they would be safe anyway.
|
That just isn't true. I have seen players who have been recognized as intentionally or habitually obstructed runners, be given a warning and then ejected for unsportsmanlike conduct if such action continued. There is no problem with this and a good umpire will take that action without hesitation or fear of being chastised for doing their job. The problem here is that coaches are so used to getting their way, a coach caught will attempt to "red line" (or whatever designation is used in your area) that umpire and that just isn't right. I'm not saying this is prevelant, but I have seen this occur in NCAA, NFHS and ASA. I know an ASA Elite and ISF Certified umpire who could not work a local Div I university as the coach simply would not allow him on HER field.
Quote:
|
It is the umpire that will make the right call even if it will cause an arguement. If all the umpires are consistantly calling something it won't be argued anymore it will be expected.
|
And as the NCAA takes more control of the softball officials, many of the problems should be resolved. However, there are still a bundle of GAGA umpires around who will adjust their game to the coach's desires as opposed to the rules. And I don't think that is a good thing at anytime.
Sorry for the rant and, of course, JMHO,
[Edited by IRISHMAFIA on Jan 23rd, 2005 at 06:47 PM]
|
To be honest, baseball is moving in the direction of "no ball, no block."
Matter of fact, the NCAA was the first major rules body to put this in place. No ball? Obstruction. All obstruction is delayed dead, too, in NCAA baseball (like NFHS, but very much unlike the OBR).
--Rich
|