Quote:
Originally posted by Almost Always Right
Good call Larry!
I contend that the rule that has to take precedence here is the airborn shooter rule.
All of this happened as he was an airborne shooter(rule was cited earlier). This sounds like a phenomenal play. We can't set aside a rule just because the play is out of the ordinary.
A similar play would be A1 going from the right side of the bucket with the ball in the right hand and doing a reverse lay-up on the other side of the lane with the left hand and in the middle getting fouled. What is the difference between these two plays?
What type of dialogue took place with the benches? and the table?
Just curious.
|
A1 has CONTROL of the ball in that situation. It is continuous control and therefore CONTINUOUS MOTION.