Thread: Backcourt redux
View Single Post
  #78 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 25, 2005, 06:34pm
assignmentmaker assignmentmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
9.9.1 Clear as mud or just playing beyond its ability?

A Player shall not . . .
ART.1 . . . Be the first to touch a ball after it's been in team control in the frontcourt, if he/she or a teammate last touched or was touched by said ball having frontcourt status before it went to the backcourt.

If it were written this way, player A, in the backcourt in the original scenario, is more clearly the last to touch the ball having frontcourt status and the first to touch it after it has acquired backcourt status. Violation.

That's why I alluded to the 'catches the tap' issue. not because it is a perfect analogy, but because it is precedent for having, at times, to apply two rules at once.

__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote