Quote:
Originally posted by Maverick
Not to be argumentative, but I believe I did use a rule (4-4-4). I don't argue that a B player was the last one to touch the ball in the front court but I don't see how it could be ruled that B caused the ball to go to the back court when the ball didn't have back court status until A touched it.
|
R4-4-4 says that A was the first to touch the ball in the back court. Again, what rule is he violating by doing so?