Quote:
Originally posted by ref18
The way that statement is worded, it sounds like the NCAA uses "lag-time" with regards to timing. I thought they didn't.
So just for the sake of argument wouldn't it be better to count the basket, and put time on the clock, because by rule the clock was to have stopped when the foul was called, meaning there should still be time left in the game?? Or is there an expection somewhere that allows this to happen??
Now I don't officiate using NCAA rules, so I'm just going by what I've picked up on this forum in the past, but it seems like they've used the timer's lag-time in this interpretation.
For those of you who do use NCAA rules, please correct me if I'm wrong.
|
The latest NCAA bulletin highlighted the fact that putting .1 or .2 seconds back on the clock is OVERKILL! The defined expectation is that a slight amount of time "lag" is expected and acceptable.
[Edited by Indy_Ref on Jan 19th, 2005 at 12:03 PM]