Quote:
Originally posted by ljudge
MJT - I see what you're talking about and have read the case you noted. I never realized the case book has inconsistent rulings when it comes to determining the end of the run. In cases 10.2.3 situation (p. 81) and 10.4.3 situation a (p. 84) they show basic spots being where the player in possession had fumbled which is why I came up with the ruling I had in 1a. Now I'm really confused.
Take a look at those two cases and let me know your thoughts.
|
That is the problem with the one I stated. Normally, as stated in the 2 situations you just mentioned, you enforce from the spot of the fumble. The post I made does not follow this, and the only difference is the fumble occurs in the EZ, rolls out of the EZ and OOB's in one spot, and is recovered in the other. The NCAA clarifies situation (b) I mentioned, but not (a).
All I can say is, the NF does not clarify why, but 10.4.5I NF casebook shows a different enforcement if the fumble occured in the EZ.