Quote:
Originally posted by ljudge
MJT - B now has the ball in his own endzone so force is not a factor. If A accepts the foul by B (which they will) you need to enforce from the end of B's run which is in the endzone. It's a foul during a running play by B. The basic spot is the end of the run which is the endzone, hence a safety (in the situation I provided).
Now back to the original questions....in both 1a and 1b I'd enforce the facemask foul from the goal line...again since the run ended there.
The bleeding player may participate in the next down as well.
In the rulings I've laid out I was told this was changing but I haven't seen anything on this yet. Frankly, I have a difficult time calling a play a safety (in the situation I laid out) because the foul didn't occur in the endzone nor did the ball become dead there.
[Edited by ljudge on Jan 14th, 2005 at 07:51 AM]
|
I did mess up not reading it was B's foul in your twist. It would be a safety in that case.
Back to the original 1a and 1b are NOT enforced from the EZ. One, maybe, or maybe not, but not BOTH. I don't quite understand the difference in the rulings, which I will post the answers to about 3:00 today.
Take some more shots at it before I give the answers to you.