Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Speaking of hijacking threads...
Quote:
|
a) when an obstructed runner, after the obstruction, safely obtains the base they would have been awarded, in the umpires judgment, had there been no obstruction and there is a subsequent play on a different runner, the obstructed runner is no longer protected between the bases where they were obstructed and may be put out,
|
Anyone care to make book on how long it will take to delete the phrase "and there is a subsequent play on a different runner" from this rule?
|
Yes, I would!
I campaigned for a rewording the minute I saw the proposed change and was summarily dismissed by a couple of NUS members.
I believe that is because ASA adopted what the Fed says will be their rule of the future. IOW, it is a conspiracy
