Mon Jan 10, 2005, 03:47pm
|
 |
Keeper of the HAMMER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Somebody, anybody:
Please tell BZ to take a Valium and go back and read my posts in this thread.
MTD, Sr.
BZ:
Go back and read your first post. You made a statement that was not correct. Now read the rest of my posts. I have answered your question like I said I would and gave you an example of an intentional foul where no contact is involved. Of course the intentional foul has to be a technical foul if no contact is involved. But read your first post, you stated, and I quote you once again: "An intentional foul may or may not be a technical foul, but is ALWAYS a contact foul, 4-19-3." That is not a true statement.
MTD, Sr.
|
Let's also re-read 4-19-3. The first 9 words are interesting.
An intentional foul is a PERSONAL or technical foul...
Now let's look at 4-19-1, a PERSONAL foul is a player foul which involves illegal CONTACT.
That sure seems to say that an intentional foul NEEDS to have contact.
|
No, it doesn't by the definitions you just gave. It leaves open the possibility of a Intentional Technical foul, which does not have to involve contact.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
|