Mon Jan 03, 2005, 04:03pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
|
|
Tom:
Go back and read the entire passage. It is referring to the same old appeal processes that have always been able to get an obstructed runner put out between the bases where the obstruction occurred. Here is the entire passage:
Quote:
"Rule #8, Section 5 B 1 1. An obstructed runner may not be called out between the two bases where obstructed unless properly appealed for:
NEW a) when an obstructed runner, after the obstruction, safely obtains the base they would have been awarded, in the umpires judgment, had there been no obstruction and there is a subsequent play on a different runner, the obstructed runner is no longer protected between the bases where they were obstructed and may be put out,
b. when properly appealed for missing a base,
c. when properly appealed for leaving a base before a fly ball was first touched
d. when committing an act of interference, or
e. when passing another runner.
Comment: This change maintains an offense/defense balance that eliminates confusion on an obstruction play between bases."
|
__________________
Scott
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
|