|
Under Fed rules kdf5 has it correct in my opinion. The snap was completely legal. Warrenkicker put up the definition as it is in the book. The post said the snapper puts his hands between his legs to bat the ball backwards. So to put the ball between his legs the original motion had to have been backward. Now the piece that's in the rule book under the definition (article) that warrenkicker pointed out is that a "snap ends when the ball touches the ground or any player." So, the snap started and ended legally by definition. Therefore you have the ruling kdf5 pointed out...double foul followed by DB foul.
|