View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2004, 06:30am
cowbyfan1 cowbyfan1 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
Re: Don't make sense

Quote:
Originally posted by David B
Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress

6.1.1j: With R1 on first base, F1, from the set position and prior to bringing his hands together while in contact with the pitcher's plate, (a) abruptly and quickly turns his shoulders toward first base in an attempt to drive back the runner; or (b) casually turns his shoulders to observe the runner at first base. RULING: Legal in both (a) and (b).

Have I been teaching this wrong all these years?

The pitcher can feint without arm motion. Right? In our area OBR pitchers always step off as they whirl their shoulders toward first. MLB pitchers do the same thing, don't they?

Wouldn't I call a balk if a play such as 6.1.1j -(a) happened in an MSBL game?
this is crazy. If he does what is in (a) above its still going to be a balk or we're going to have lots of "splaining" to do and probably an ejection to follow.

I see the point of (b) but (a) makes no sense at all.

Thanks
David [/B]
I have to agree on this. The fast turning of the shoulders has always been looked at as being a feint and thus a balk at any level. It will lead to serious arguments on a ball field and probably ejections of coaches that are, in theory and history, right, but in reality or the new rule/interpetation are not.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote