I just talked to our state's head interpreter on the phone in person and referred him to case book 7.5.7B (Situation C) along with the 2001-2002 rule book citation that Rockyroad gave me which specifies that the endline privileges end once the throw-in ends and I got nowhere.
Our state is interpreting that Situation C is a spot-throw in rather than a endline run throw-in, not because hitting the ball out of bounds is a violation, but rather because the ball was legally touched and then went out of bounds so team B did NOT committ a violation.
So in NW Washington, we will still let team A have endline run privileges if a foul or violation occurs AFTER the throw-in and the ensuing throw-in takes place once again on the endline.
Does anyone on this board have the contacts to get the NFHS to add a SITUATION D to case play 7.5.7B where a foul takes place AFTER the throw-in is completed and the throw-in will once again be on the endline? Until we get that (or until we return to the wording of 2001-2002 where it tells when the endline privileges end), nothing will change here.
Thanks!
Z
|