|
I think this rule follows that spirit. It is now written clearly and should be called as Federation desires.
Of course it will be called as FED desires. No problem there. Written cleanly? Nope. Got more holes than a sieve.
I've always agreed with anyone who so stated that FED's case book is the best in the rules biz. (There, that doesn't limit me to you and that other guy.) That's never been an issue. I just disagree to some extent as to which rules differences are really beneficial. Obviously you are closer in line with Carl and other giants in the industry than I am.
But what do I know? I'm just a little ol' barely qualified umpire from Spokane.
__________________
GB
|