Quote:
Originally posted by David B
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
I have just received an email from Mary Struckhoff, Editor of the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee.
Her ruling was the same as mine. Team A correctly inbounded the ball. The Timer made a mistake by incorrectly starting the clock to soon. Team A shall inbound the ball closest to the spot where A3 had caught A2's throw-in pass. She stated that anywere from 0.2 to 0.4 seconds could be taken off the game clock.
Since the game clock in this play showed tenths of a second, I never thought to ask her if anytime should be taken off the game clock if it were a game clock that showed only whole seconds. It would be my interpretation that the officials would not be able to take any time off of the game clock.
MTD, Sr.
|
Since she didn't state any rules to cover this I would still say that the officials could do whatever they wanted and be correct by rule.
We have the guys from Arizona saying one thing and the gal that edits the rules saying another - that sounds about right for FED.
I still agree that the only thing fair to do is to do it over or call the game as over.
The officials manual covers this type of play as I stated in last years thread - it also gives the officals latitude to correct it as they see fit.
Thanks
David
|
Gary Whelchel was the rules committee chair, it was convenient of Mark to not share Ms. Struckhoff's actual response, but to only say she agreed with his ruling.
This is simple you have rules support, 5-9-1, that the Timer started the clock correctly. You have rules support, 5-9-4, that the OFFICIAL incorrectly chopped in time.
5.10.1.C deals with officials error causing time to expire, so you have rules support to end the game.
For fairness, 2-3 comes into play, even though it is covered by 5.10.1.C, that would be the right thing to do, even if the rules don't support it.
There is NOTHING in Mark's ruling that is supported by rule.