|
I didn't change a thing.
Me thinks you had an obstructed view when you read my post. I suggest you read the second section again and I'll make it easy on you and quote the section. Read it slowly.(:>) Grin, grin, large grin.
"The interference of a runner with a fielder in the act of fielding a "BATTED" ball 'does not have to be intentional'. ANY ACTION, HOWEVER, THAT IS TAKEN BY THE RUNNER WHICH IS PAPALBY DESIGNED TO INTERFERE SHOULD BE RULED INTERFERENCE. THIS INCLUDES TIMING HIS ADVANCEMENT TO INTENTIONALLY CONFUSE OF(SIC) HINDER THE FIELDER."
Thrown ball was never mentioned in that section which is closer to the original play. I only quoted the first section because of the words "VISUAL INTERFERENCE". G.
|