[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Here is my take on this situation. I like the NCAA A.R. and dislike the NFHS Casebook Play Ruling. In the play we are discussing the R tell his partners, that there is a problem at the Table and that the problem has to be fixed before the game can continue. What part of those instructions do his partners not understand? The R has said that the game will not continue until the problem at the Table has been fixed, and no matter what his two bonehead partners do after his decision cannot override the R's decision to stop the game.

MTD, Sr.