Quote:
Originally posted by Leecedar
Isn't that what she's doing? Trying to make a play on a base runner? IN MY JUDGMENT (oh how I love those words), yes, and therefore, no violation, no ball four, and we don't have to be ogres.
Lee
|
Okay, now tell me the difference in allowing a play on a non-existant runner and allowing a throw on a non-existant third strike?
If you are going to presume the catcher "thought" she was doing the right thing in one instance, why is that this "presumption" would not apply to the other?
Stirring up trouble?
Maybe!