|
Jurassic,
Mon frêre, you are mistaken about why this thread piqued my interest. Go back and look at my first response. It was not directed at anyone other than the cheaters. Rut took umbrage with a baseball umpire projecting his wisdom on his sacred domain. My argument was and remains with the person that began this debacle. Officiating and cheating are polar opposites. We frown on any authority figure caught in the web of deceit and greed. My contention is that if it is a meaningless test, why do you require the answers? Obviously, if he/she has the test and claims to be an official, he/she should have the requisite knowledge to explore those questions with integrity. Rut charged in and attempted to mount a defense of their actions. As weve seen, there is none, cheating is cheating.
P.S.: Yes, Ive spoken in flowery prose in a cheap attempt to confuse and bewilder our little friend.
I must have missed a memo putting you in charge. I will go away when reason returns to this board.
|