View Single Post
  #74 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 11, 2004, 11:56am
RookieDude RookieDude is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What is right about a player being OOB

Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by coachz_216
Second, Rule 10.6.2 states "...If a dribbler, without contact, sufficiently passes an opponent to have head and shoulders in advance of that opponent, the greater responsibility for subsequent contact is on the opponent..." If a defensive player, properly taught, is in perfect defensive position, playing in a textbook, defensive stance, and stops with his foot just short of a boundary (trying to abide by this ridiculous rule), there is more than adequate room for a skilled dribbler to take a line directly over his outstretched leg and "...have head and shoulders in advance of that opponent..."

Again--a poorly thought out rule that creates an impossible situation for a defender--even if he is doing everything perfectly!



But, some rule in 4 (iirc -- I'm without my books today -- somewehre around 4-7) says that if there's insufficient space between two defenders, or between a defender and a boundary line, then the offensive player is responsible for the contact. That's the rule to apply in this situation.

True...and it even gives a distance, I believe, of 3 feet or less between the defender and the boundary line.

And, kind of like your porno reference in another thread...if it looks like a charge, it probably is a charge...I'll know it when I see it (At least in WA state) even if the defender's little toe is on the line.

[Edited by RookieDude on Nov 11th, 2004 at 12:00 PM]
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote