Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
|
Originally posted by BushRef
|
I disagree. OK, not really, but where's the ruling?
|
Oh ye of little faith...... 
http://www.nfhs.org/scriptcontent/va...Category_ID=29
Click on this link, then look up "Rules Interpretations Release Date: 11/7/03" near the bottom of the left-hand column and click on that. Check out Situation 15. This is a year-old interpretation. Still valid but eminently forgettable. I don't have a clue why it never made this year's case book.
|
Hmmmm.....maybe I gotta make a phone call on this... [/B]
|
Dan, look in the front of your 2003-04 Case Book under "Comments on the 2003-04 Revisions" on p3. You'll see
9.11.4SITUATION near the bottom of the page. That play is similar to Situation 15 on the NFHS web-site that I referred to, except that a part(c) has been added. That (c) part talks about BI not being applicable after the ring stops vibrating(returns to it's normal position). Note that it says "vibrating" and not "stopped moving up and down". I read that as the ring having to come to a complete rest again before the BI restrictions come off. Sound logical? [/B][/QUOTE]
Yep, very good!