Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
WOW!!
You guys are specifically ignoring a RULE. What's the rationale behind that? This isn't an interpretation of a rule on the part of your rules people. You're making up your own rule. It's telling your guys very explicitly to NOT follow an NFHS ruling. As a matter of fact the FED still has the interpretation posted that says that you guys are completely wrong. Here's the link- Check out #13(b):
http://www.nfhs.org/scriptcontent/va...Category_ID=29
There's a lotta rules that I don't like either, but I can't change them just because I don't agree with them.
WOW!
[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Nov 9th, 2004 at 01:07 PM]
|
I'm just the messenger JR. Don't shoot me.
|
Never any intent to "shoot" you, Z. You know that. And I've also been around long enough to know that you had better do exactly what your interpreter tells you to do- at least if you feel like doing some games every now and then. I just can't understand how they can issue that ruling though. It's not an interpretation of an existing rule; it's telling their constituents to IGNORE an existing rule in favor of their own strictly local rule. Now you got every state in the Union calling it one way, except for Washington who's calling it a different way. Don't make sense to me.