Thread: Sub
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 08, 2004, 08:24am
RookieDude RookieDude is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Nevadaref
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by RookieDude
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by RookieDude
Mark,
Red Neck's question sounds alot like question #89 on the NFHS test.
#89. The official should not grant a player's request for a time-out until after an injured player has been replaced when a substitute is available.

True or False?

I put False sorta based on what you were "dancing around".

The answer to NFHS #89 is True. Case book play 3.3.1SitD(c) refers to a bleeding player, but the rule is the same for injured players also. Note that this case book play refers to a player on the opposing team to the injured/bleeding player trying to call a TO before the injured/bleeding player is replaced. The TO request in this particular case is denied until the injured/bleeding player on the opposing team is substituted for.

[Edited by RookieDude on Nov 8th, 2004 at 08:29 AM]
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote