| 
			
			 
			
				Thu Oct 28, 2004, 09:51pm
			
			
			
		 | 
	| 
		
			
			| Official Forum Member |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: USA 
						Posts: 14,565
					      |  | 
	
	| 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Steve M A couple of years ago, we had a discussion on the possibility of a running lane violation by the batter-runner on a walk.  At that time, Fed had just taken the position that the batter-runner must advance to first within the running lane or risk being called out on interference if hit by a throw to first.  In a hotel room discussion with 3 members of ASA's national staff, my state uic, several district uic's, and a guy who was then an asst state uic (I think you were there, Mike), it was made very clear that ASA did not agree with Fed - the B-R was awarded 1B and could not be put out on a running lane violation because there was no legitimate play to be made at 1B - until after the B-R had passed 1B.  These same folks - some of whom are pretty well known in the NCAA ranks - at least 3 world series and I don't know how many regionals - made the statement that the NCAA had the same position as the ASA.  Until today, I accepted that without question.  I agreed strongly with the ASA and NCAA position - and I still do.  However, I have an email from Dee Abrahamson, forwarded to me by a friend, that states the NCAA position is the same as the Fed position.  She also stated that there will be a note added to Rule 12, Section 2, Article a to clarify their position.  I am surprised and disappointed, but will call their games using their rules and rulings.
 
 Mike - Any chance that ASA is going to make this rule change?
 |  I certainly hope not.  I'll try to remember to ask next weekend in Mobile.
		 
				__________________The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
 |