View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 24, 2004, 08:50pm
OverAndBack OverAndBack is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
I think you misunderstood what happened in the Bears game. It's perfectly legal for the TE to be uncovered and it's done dozens of times in every game.
That's what confused me. I was thinking "So?" because that's the way the referee (Jeff Triplette - they had a bit of a tough game) explained it twice - he just said illegal formation, tight end was uncovered. The gamebook only says "Illegal formation, 5 yards" and one of the two times it's listed as being on #84 Wade, who is a wide receiver.

Quote:

In the NFL, the formation is illegal if a TE is covered up, or if a lineman who has not reported as eligible is uncovered.
So....help me out here. I've been watching the NFL since 1977, you mean to tell me that in all that time a team has never lined up with a wideout on the same side as the tight end being on the line, covering the tight end? That there's never been anything but flankers out there?

Quote:

In NFHS, as long as there are 7 players on the LOS and all other players are in the backfield except the QB, the formation is legal. If an eligible number is covered up, he is ineligible.
Okay, got it for our level. Two more games left in the season, I've got one more thing to watch out for.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever.
Reply With Quote