Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
This criteria list is not strictly true but good enough for 99% of real cases.
|
What would be the criterion for the other 1% of cases? You've got me stumped.
|
It has to do with the exceptions that are no longer listed as exceptions in the rule book.
|
Not what I was thinking...see Bob's post above.
It's not where they touched it but when.
|
The 4 criteria did not cover the items that were once listed as exceptions but are now simply written into the rule
For example, according to the 4 criteria, a throw-in situation where A2 leaves the floor in the FC, catches the ball while airborne and lands in the BC is a violation. But the former exception, now part of the rule, states that it isn't a violation.