Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Tony,
I understood your point and don't disagree with it. It is certainly possible to see it as a multiple foul. I was merely trying to explain why Case Book play 4.19.11 calls this a FALSE multiple foul. That is a fact that neither of us can dispute.
|
Nevada, I wasn't commenting on anything you wrote. In fact, I didn't even read your post. I was simply commenting that Camron made the exact same observation that I made.