View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 14, 2004, 12:26pm
TimTaylor TimTaylor is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally posted by officialtony
HS Varsity match. Tean A is ready to serve when Team B's coach sees her girls are overlapped - she is desparately trying to corect this. R blows the whistle and signals for serve. She shouts to the U " line up check ! " as team A serves, the U walks out on the court waving his arms and states that Team B is requesting a line-up check ( ball is already over the net and in for an apparent ace ). R halts play and lets U check AND correct the line-up. R then signals for Team A to serve. Ruling please?
Interesting question Tony.....I actually had something very similar happen last week, only the request was clearly between the signal for serve & the ball being served. I was the umpire, and what I did was ignore the request, called the misalignment, then told her "sorry coach, he'd already signaled for the serve". She accepted that, got her alignment check, & we moved on.

In digging a little deeper, this is what I came up with:
Rule 12.2.5.b allows coach to ask for, among other things, a lineup check during a dead ball.
Rules 9.3.1 & 9.3.2 clearly state that the ball does not become live until struck for serve.
Rules 10.1.2.c and 11.2.1 specifically disallow requests for substitiutions and timeouts after the Referee signals for serve.
I can find no mention in either the rulebook or casebook for similar exceptions for allowed dead ball requests under rule 12.2.5.b.

Interesting, eh? It would appear at face value that the Federation's intent is to disallow requests after the referee signals for serve, but if that's truly the case, why didn't they just say that, instead of specifically disallowing timeout & substitution requests? A simple "no requests allowed after signal to serve is given" would be great! Sometimed NFHS drives me nuts.......

Reply With Quote