View Single Post
  #94 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 31, 2001, 08:20pm
DDonnelly19 DDonnelly19 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 61
Send a message via ICQ to DDonnelly19 Send a message via AIM to DDonnelly19 Send a message via Yahoo to DDonnelly19
Quote:
Originally posted by rex

After all that's what debate is all about, proving your right even if know your wrong.
You can debate the values of an issue, but you can't debate facts. You can debate why or why not abortion is morally wrong, but you can't argue that Roe v. Wade does not exist, or why the Supreme Court ruled that way.

Carl has given us the PBUC ruling. We can argue why or why not the ruling is fair (which there seems to be no debate on that issue), but rex is arguing why and how the PBUC made this ruling. Unless we ask the PBUC directly their intentions, we don't know -- they just expect us to rule that way.

Again, I plead that if someone is truly against this ruling he/she should take it up to the PBUC directly, because arguing your case here obviously isn't getting anything done.

Dennis