Thread: Question
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 08, 2004, 11:10am
Texoma_LJ Texoma_LJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
In regards to the issue of fairness because A is gaining an advantage somehow, my first thought was, if B had not committed the first penalty would the second penalty ever existed? In most cases, I would think not. Therefore, if B commits the first act, he is paying for his actions of being the primary offender.
Reply With Quote