Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
I think it is obvious that if one accepts that the game requires a BR to advance to first base, then all of the following make sense:
|
I don't think anyone would disagree that the BR
needs to advance to 1B to avoid being put out, in the same sense that any forced runner needs to advance; he can stay where he is now, but his only safe haven is 90' away. Looking at it that way, one could say that a runner/BR is "forced" to advance if he doesn't want to be put out. Of course, then any runner would be "forced" back to a base on a caught fly ball, and we know that wouldn't mesh well with the rest of the rulebook.
The problem is that the "rulebook" definition of a "forced runner" looks at it differently, and subsequent rulings are based on this definition (sans the FED passage) -- a runner is seemingly "forced" to advance when he can no longer claim the base he occupies as a safe haven; he's actually "forced" to
vacate his base. Since a batter never initially occupies any base, he cannot be considered "forced" by this definition.
To summarize, the issue is not that a runner is forced to
advance, but that a runner is forced to
vacate.
Dennis