Quote:
Originally posted by Kaliix
Here's my question:
Why can't someone write the rule so that it clearly and unabiguously addresses the situation.
Why is that we need 20 interpretations to the rule???
|
Kaliix;
Here's my answer:
If the rules were clear, big dogs would have nothing to lord over little dogs. With things in a muddle, big dogs can always be right, no matter what they do. Likewise, little dogs can always be wrong and big dogs can make fun of them.
As a big dog, I prefer things to be ambiguous. It makes it easier to keep little dogs in their place. By using common sense and fair play, I can convince the coaches that I am right. Likewise, the little dogs that try to enforce the rules are seen as incompetent.
It is so easy when you understand the politics.
Peter