View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 29, 2004, 10:10am
Kaliix Kaliix is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 555
Here's my question:
Why can't someone write the rule so that it clearly and unabiguously addresses the situation.

Why is it that the rule, as written, can't cover when the ball is considered lodged, what outs can be made (if any) with the lodged ball, and when does the ball become dead and bases awarded?

Why is that we need 20 interpretations to the rule???

This is not freakin' rocket science people. Geez!!!
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
Reply With Quote