Warren, I think we agree on many of the issues of principle (other than whether I will have to bring you a cake (gr).
Most umpires (including me) would prefer to have the disabled prove it is safe for them to be on the field. I don't have the scientific training or access to the necessary data to perform a competent risk analysis. My league doesn't have the funds to employ an expert to advise us on the safety issues. I too don't want to see a serious injury to occur because of a wheelchair 6 feet from third base.
But, in the US, the law is clear and unambigous - - the burden is on those responsible for promulgating, interpreting, or enforcing the ban. As long as teams play in public parks, schools and facilities, the ADA will be the deciding force granting access to the disabled. I don't know of any judge who would tolerate an association not complying with an order to let a coach play on the grounds that the umpires refused to call the game. We can pretend that the law doesn't cover us, but any association or umpire actually faced with this situation will need better advice than simply ban them or walk.
You know it's going to be a tough game when you arrive at the field and see a court reporter.
|