Quote:
Originally posted by Kaliix
Tim and mcrowder,
Who exactly said that they would dump a catcher because they were bad, ie. the catcher moved to block/catch/stop a ball but missed. I don't believe anyone did.
You guys are just trolling...
|
Gee, I guess a lot of us can't read because:
Jumpmaster
Sep 20th, 2004 11:16 AM
If that doesn't fix the problem, "Coach, get me a catcher."
Kaliix
Sep 20th, 2004 11:34 AM
You don't move again, and I'll take it as you doing it intentionally and I will toss you!"
gordon30307
Sep 20th, 2004 12:11 PM
Before the inning is over I tell the coach to get someone else in here
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Sep 21st, 2004 02:13 PM
I let the catcher's coach that if the catcher did not start doing his job, that coach would have to find a new catcher.
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Sep 21st, 2004 03:14 PM
But when a cather makes NO attempt to do his job behind the plate and the umpire is getting hit with pitches that, with ordinary effort, should be caught by the catcher, then that catcher does not deserve to stay in the game.
DownTownTonyBrown
Sep 22nd, 2004 03:15 Pm
Coach, you want a good job? Get a catcher that does a good job. Simple. Call it an ejection if you want. I think it is just a way of making the game go smoothly and allowing me to do a proper job.