Thread: OOB or NO CALL?
View Single Post
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 18, 2004, 10:18am
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimgolf
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimgolf
From NFHS site description of differences between NFHS and NCAA: "Player out of bounds - first to touch the ball – gaining advantage - Technical Foul".

I stand corrected. Even though I'm sitting. Thanks for playing devil's advocate, Jurassic.
It shouldn't be "first to touch the ball" should it? It's not illegal to be the first to touch the ball after being out of bounds as long as you're not touching out of bounds when you touch the ball.
This is not an OOB violation. The violation is for stepping OOB on purpose & then being the first player to touch the ball after you come back in. Used to be a T.

Whether it is or is not, this is the verbiage from NFHS. It says HS Technical, NCAA Violation.

http://www.nfhs.org/staticcontent/pd...nces_04-05.pdf
Jim, I'm not arguing your chart.

All I'm saying (to Juulie) is that the violation is not an OOB violation, so the usual OOB stuff - like you can be first to touch after going OOB after returning inbounds - does not apply.
Reply With Quote