Thread: OOB or NO CALL?
View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 16, 2004, 05:41pm
blindzebra blindzebra is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally posted by Mregor
Jimgolf,
I was with you up until this statement...

Quote:
Originally posted by Jimgolf
By the way, no advantage is given to the offense in the described situation, since as soon as the player goes out of bounds it is a violation
I believe it wouldn't be a violation until he stepped back on court and continued the dribble. Just based on the way I learned it; I can't even recall where I got it from but I believe it was a CB play at one time.

Although I haven't read to POE or the new books, I would have a very difficult time T'ing this. Just like the player who I'm telling to get out of the lane and he steps OOB to avoid the violation, I'm calling the violation before the T.

Mregor
Why?

If it's an OOB violation you are saying A1 has player control, so if A1 was holding it and stepped OOB would you wait until A1 got both feet back in bounds? If it's a dribble, it's a violation the instant A1 goes OOB.

Your only other choices are nothing on an interrupted dribble or a T for leaving the court.
Reply With Quote