Thread: OOB or NO CALL?
View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 16, 2004, 02:33pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimgolf

By inference, the POE must apply to a player that is not dribbling, since there is already a rule covering the situation.
Unfortunately, "inference" isn't needed to make the call that the NFHS is telling us to make. There is an explicit "reference" in the POE that already states "an offensive player" can't go around a defensive player by running out of bounds. Not "an offensive player without the ball", Jim and MTD Sr., but "an offensive player". "Dribblers" are "offensive players", aren't they? The POE states that it's a T if an "offensive player" runs OOB to go around a defensive player. Pretty plain and explicit language, methinks.
It also states the offensive player gains an advantage by running around the defender - and I believe advantage is a key concept in the reworded ncaa rule related to this as well. With that in mind - what advantage is gained if we apply the existing rule for a dribbler stepping OOB?
Reply With Quote