|
It has struck me odd how different the set-up is from state to state with officials.
The first time I officiated it was required to attend rules meetings wiht other officials (0 to 20+ years at all levels), Must attend 7 out of 8 weeks of rule instruction, game situations etc. Then a closed book test that lasted about 2 hours. Licenses were then issued on a class I or II basis. Class I for varsity and college level. Class II for all levels below varsity. One year spent at level I before being eligible for level II. Good system, learned from being with experienced officials and clsoed book meant you had to study.
This time around, they mail a test with the books, you fill it out and send it back. I have heard first hand officials asking each other for test results. Three are "state" rule meetings to review changes, but this is a formality requirement. Not having any "experience" I will not get alot of varsity games, or be eligible for playoff games. Although, I know that I study alot more than others, and I do have some previous experience.
The two tests account for eligibility in grading officials for playoff games (at least here), why not make the second one a mandatory closed book test. Lets make rule meetings obligatory. The young officials are much more apt to learn, and the more experienced officials can teach and mentor. The older officials that do playoff games wil have to earn the right to call these games. And if a young officail can prive himself early, what is wrong with having him get a well earned opportunity.
|