[Jim S]

Tape question. Go back and read the rule again guys. What part of the body is the question about? And what part(s) of the body is exempted?
Question has to do with what it asks Jimmy!

actmiller, your example is not a non-player, he is a substitute (see definition), and is covered as such under the illegal participation rules. A non-player is someone such as a coach trainer, doctor etc., AND a substitute, or replaced payer "who does not participate by touching the ball, hindering an opponent, or influencing the play."
In other words, if he does participate, he wasn't a non-player. HUH?
Jimmy I think this is where the confusion comes from. It's the casebook using the term non-player. I believe here they are talking about substitutes and such. But then I could be mistaken. I would lean more to the unfair act in this case.

[Edited by Jim S on Sep 9th, 2004 at 05:36 PM]