[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Carl Childress
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB
Are you saying that the BRD does indeed include actual intrepretations in addition to the non interpretation descriptions of language? And if that is the case, how are the two differentiated. (I'm sorry, but my copies of the BRD only go to 2001, perhaps this is all handled differently in the newer editions.)
|
Quote:
What I'm saying: I wonder if the Red Sox are ever going to lose a game.
You know exactly what I mean, and you are fooling not one soul on this Board who knows anything about your "history."
Read the introduction to the BRD, even in your antiquated edition. When I "interpret" a rule, I say so.
And you know that. As does everyone who owns a copy of the BRD.
Knock yourself out -- solo.
I'm just amazed it took me so long to figure out you weren't seriously interested in advancing your "knowledge" of the FED.
Stupid.
|
Wow. You won't respond to a civil question, yet you'll take the time to edit your post to add:
I'm just amazed it took me so long to figure out you weren't seriously interested in advancing your "knowledge" of the FED.
Stupid.
This addition, by the way makes no sense. From the beginning of my exchange with you, I was inquiring about the play in the BRD, not about the FED rule. I made it very clear that I was trying to advance my knowledge of your wording, not FED's. That's why I came to you.
I'm sorry if I failed to understand that your play was a description of language and not an interpetation Carl. I had honestly not read reference to that in the BRD introduction. You blast me for not knowing that yet say not a word to others who posted that play as (wrongly, apparently)an interpretation backing up their position. You didn't tell them that it was only a description of Language. Not until I asked you directly did you inform of us of that.
And why so pissy? Are we not allowed to ask what you mean in the BRD when we are confused? Great customer service, as Peter would say. Jesus Carl, lighten up.
[Edited by GarthB on Sep 4th, 2004 at 06:11 PM]