PA, I concur with you. Yes, if we edit only what we want, then there are some good questions. But there have been some outlandish questions asked that might not happen in a hundred years!
Do we get anything out of it? Maybe, maybe not. I believe that it is intended to let the brain, and eyes, back to the rule book. Remember, it was the off season, so the talk was slow. A lot of hypothetical situations arise.
But, please, Carl, to say that out of all the long winded post in the off season, that six that you picked were instructional is a very low percentage to the whole lot. No one is questioning the board, just asking questions. No need to defend so strictly.
Thane, good job backing up your partner (who gave you an autographed BRD). I would back you to the hilt Carl, if you would give me an autographed something.
Max