View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 19, 2004, 01:59pm
Jim Porter Jim Porter is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In the past.......

Quote:
Originally posted by Kaliix
There is no provision in the rule for incidental contact, nor should there be since there can be an advantage gained by just coming close.
Certainly, there can be interference without contact. Just coming close all by itself can be considered interference if the runner impeded the fielder's attempt to make a play. But you don't subscribe to the notion that there can be contact but no interference?
__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote