View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 13, 2004, 01:55pm
Gee Gee is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 305
Jim,

There are several ways that a runner can interfere with a fielder. Some are called incidental contact, some are overlooked and others are not even considered, especially by MLU's.

But when you clearly see a runner actually make contact with a fielder who is protected and positioning himself to field the ball I see no alternative but to kill the play. If for no other reason, self preservation.

I realize that contact is not needed but it sure adds a whole bunch to the calling umpires position.

It seems your main point in not calling it was to avoid a confrontation with Franco. Do you really think that BIG LOU would have just sat there in the dugout blowing bubbles and watch that run score? Not in your life.

When they change the rules and allow a delayed interference call on this play I'll do it but until that time I've got a golden out. G.

---------------------------------------------





Quote:
Originally posted by Jim Porter
We all know that obstruction was once an immediate dead ball. Then some rules committee decided one day that a delayed dead ball would be wiser. Why not a delayed dead ball with interference? A lot of umpires already do it. Umpires I know -- possibly even myself -- would've just let the play go. Even one umpire at least had the confidence in himself to admit as much right here in this thread. So I guess I can't understand why folks think I'm coming from left field on this one.

Gee said, "Jim. You surprise me. In this type of interference there is no delayed dead ball and there is no incidental contact when the runner makes contact with the fielder when he is in the act of fielding a ball. You see contact, you kill it, right by the numbers."

Gee, I wasn't aware contact was illegal. The last time I checked the definition of interference contact wasn't even mentioned. Instead words like, "interferes with," and, "obstructs," and "impedes," and, "hinders," are mentioned. Since when does contact alone automatically mean interference? And how can any umpire possibly know whether a fielder has been impeded, obstructed, hindered, or interfered with in his attempt to make a play if play is killed before an attempt is even made?
Reply With Quote