View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 17, 2001, 08:52am
mick mick is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb me, too

Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref


Nah, you're just reading too much into it. Take a look
at your passage from 10-6-1 with my emphasis included:

"It is a form of pushing when the player holding the ball is contacted by a defensive player who approaches from behind. Contact that is caused by the momentum of a player who has thrown for goal is a form of charging."

10-6-1 doesn't define the only way to push, it gives one
example. It doesn't define the only way to charge,
it just gives an example. But I have even more compelling
evidence: if Tony & I agree, you can take it to the
bank! [/B]
All we have to do to understand that a charge can be a foul, other than player control, is to look at the foul signals.

NFHS: #10 Pushing or charging and NCAA: #20 Pushing or charging are identical.

NFHS: #12 Player control and NCVAA: #22 are identical

If charging was only PC then it wouldn't be the same signal as Pushing; it would be the same signal as Player control.

mick
Reply With Quote