Mr K wrote:
In thinking about interpretations of the rule, I can see were one would be applicable.
There could be some greater direction or interpretation as to when a possible appeal starts versus when a runner returning to a base that is missed actually aquired that base.
If the BR missed 2nd on his way to third and then is directed back to the 2nd base by the 3rd base coach who sees that he missed second, there could be a debate about when the appeal starts. Does the appeal have to be initiated before the runner reaches the base or does it have to be completed before the base is reached the BR who missed it, in order to be called out?
------------------------------------------------------
Under 7.10(d)the runner is not appealable UNTIL he leaves the immediate area of the base (I use the cutout). Prior to leaving he must be tagged. Once he leaves that area he can be appealed at any time and must get all the way back and touch the base to be safe.
As to the timing of when an appeal is denied or upheld. I find nothing in the book that realy clarifies that. It has been mentioned before but don't remember the outcome.
Personally, once the defense steps on the base and properly appeals before the runner retouches I would have an out whether or not the runner gets back before I wring him up but have nothing in black letter law to uphold that opinion. You could make a new post concerning that. G.
[Edited by Gee on Aug 11th, 2004 at 12:34 PM]
|