View Single Post
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 09, 2004, 07:36pm
ChuckElias ChuckElias is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by oatmealqueen
Do many officials feel that it is ok, on a perceived missed OOB call by their partner, to tweet and run in and try to offer info if partner hasn't asked for help?
I can't speak for "many officials", but if I am 100% sure that my partner signaled the wrong direction on an OOB call, I will tweet and tell him/her that I'm positive there was a (fill in color here) touch last.

It doesn't happen often in a 2-whistle game, b/c I am rarely 100% sure of my partner's area. It doesn't happen often in a 3-whistle game, b/c I have very good partners most of the time in my college games.

Just as an aside, can we please get rid of the "110%" nonsense when we have this kind of discussion? When you say 110%, all you're saying is that you're 100% sure. So just say 100%. We'll all understand.

And yes, the hammy's still bothering me.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!